How Higgsfield AI used 9-hour credit giveaways to slash SaaS CAC

Higgsfield AI posted a tweet offering 250 free credits for their Nano Banana Pro model. The post hit 813,700 views.

Higgsfield did 3 things at once:

• Announced that Nano Banana Pro was free for everyone on X for a short window.

• Offered 250 credits via DM if you liked, retweeted, and replied within 9 hours.

• Layered on a $10k prize pool for the 10 best prompts, as long as posts tagged @higgsfield_ai, #nanobananapro, and the user's prompt.

In one shot they bought usage, user generated content, and timeline presence.

Anyone scrolling the AI corner of X (or Explore tab) would see Nano Banana Pro samples, prompts, and social proof, all anchored to the same Higgsfield campaign.

They repeat this exact playbook constantly. Unlike generic SaaS giveaways that offer "free trials" or "$50 gift cards", Higgsfield built a mechanical transaction engine inside X DMs.

Here is the Higgsfield credit giveaway X growth tactic and why it works.

Why credit giveaways beat standard trials

Credits feel like money; trials feel like chores.

"250 credits" implies a specific wallet balance while "Sign up for a trial" implies work.

Higgsfield also uses specific, weird numbers to stop the scroll. In their Face Swap launch, they offered exactly 251 credits.

They rinse and repeat this mechanic for every major feature release or a new launch in the text-to-image or text-to-video niche:

• Nano Banana Pro: 250 credits.

• Seedream 4.5: 272 credits.

• Trends x Sora 2: 150 credits.

• Face Swap: 251 credits.

This is a brute-force AI SaaS growth strategy. They are willing to eat the compute costs of thousands of free generations. In exchange, they get thousands of users trialing the software who otherwise would have scrolled past.

For AI tools, the barrier to entry is often just getting the user to try the first prompt. Once a user sees the result, they stick. Higgsfield removes the payment friction for that first session.

Scaling via DM automation

You cannot scale this manually. Higgsfield automates the reward delivery: "250 credits in DM."

This removes friction. Users know a bot is listening and the reward is instant (100% certainty), unlike a standard giveaway with a 0.1% chance of winning an iPad.

This also filters the audience. Only qualified leads willing to use an AI video generator will bother to engage. You avoid "giveaway chasers" looking for cash.

Why 9-hour deadlines beat 7-day campaigns

Higgsfield kills procrastination with brutal time limits. This FaceSwap offer explicitly states "9 hours" time limit.

9 hours is an unusual timeframe that creates panic. A 7-day giveaway spreads engagement thin.

This time constraint accomplishes 2 things:

1. It forces immediate action. The user cannot save it for later. They must engage now or lose the credits.

2. It condenses the engagement spikes. X algorithm prioritize velocity. Gaining 500 replies in 9 hours is exponentially more powerful than gaining 500 replies in 9 days. By compressing the activity window, they signal to the algorithm that this content is currently important and it must be pushed to the top of "For You" feed.

Hacking the algorithm with the 'Triple Threat'

To get the credits, you must Follow, Retweet, and Reply.

This sends a "triple-threat" signal to Twitter. A Reply is the gold standard for the algorithm because it signals conversation. By forcing all three, Higgsfield spikes the post's velocity.

On this Sora 2 post, they hit 2.6M views with a massive comment-to-retweet ratio. People complied because the bribe was valuable.

Lowering CAC with internal currency

To get 800,000 impressions via ads would cost ~$24,000 in hard cash. Higgsfield gets the same reach for pennies.

Plus, ads don't build followers.

This tactic builds an asset you keep forever.

Most companies launch once and vanish. Higgsfield treats viral growth as a muscle, not a lottery ticket. By chaining these giveaways together, they have permanently occupied the mental real estate of the AI ecosystem on X.

Whenever an AI topic (like Nano Banana Pro launch or Seedream 4.5 launch) trends on the X Explore page, Higgsfield is there, drafting off their momentum.

Search X for "from:higgsfield_ai min_faves:1000" and you'll see the pattern. Post after post with 1M+ views. All giveaways. All following the same template.

It works because they found a formula and didn't overthink it. Most companies would've pivoted after the first giveaway, worried about looking repetitive. Higgsfield just kept running the play.

Top Tweets of the day

1/

Nano Banana Pro is wonderful to turn large information into infographics.

Humans are visual animals. We understand faster with images so it is good.

2/

Ad platforms let you nuke negative comments for a reason. They know brands won't pay for ad space if the top comment is "this product doesn't work."

It's the same psychology that drives organic content: viewers read comments first, and those comments shape perception before the video even loads. Seeding comments lets you drive the narrative.

Remove the hate, amplify the love, and the herd mentality follows.

The platform gets paid via money (paid ads) or engagement (increased dwell time) and you get conversions.

3/

Many such cases, you can either automate your job fully or reduce the time it takes for you to do it.

Rabbit Holes

1. Creative Angles Powering 9-Figure Brands in 2025

2. Building and Creativity in the Age of AI

3. Programmatic SEO Guide: Create & rank 100s of pages at once

What’d ya think of today’s newsletter? Hit ‘reply’ and let me know.

Do me a favor and share it in your company's Slack #marketing channel.

First time? Subscribe.

Follow me on X.

More Startup Spells 🪄

1. Interest Graph vs Follower Graph Algorithm (LINK)

2. How Prayer Lock automates UGC marketing using Gemini 3 & Python (LINK)

3. Puma's $120k Pelé Deal at the 1970 World Cup (LINK)

4. Pizza Hut guerrilla marketing: PR on a $500 budget (LINK)

5. Kalshi influencer marketing: $1,000/month for 12 quote-tweets on X (LINK)