Hidden Fees at Checkout: How Online Stores Use Drip Pricing Psychology to Make You Spend More

Most buyers decide to purchase before they see the full, all-in price. At checkout, the mindset shifts from evaluating to finishing, which is exactly where pricing design—drip/partitioned fees, taxes shown late, and small UI nudges—does its work.

The Playbook: How Low Prices Hook You and Hidden Fees Seal the Deal

Companies anchor attention on a low base price, then reveal unavoidable or quasi-mandatory fees only after people have invested time in the flow. In practice, that means service fees, delivery fees, small-order fees, cleaning fees, and taxes appear near the end—when switching feels costly.

• Drip/partitioned pricing: show a low base first; “drip” fees later—many buyers keep the lower base / higher total option even after seeing the true total.

• Anchors everywhere: the first number becomes the reference; later add-ons are judged relative to that anchor, not the all-in total.

The Bias Stack: Why Your Brain Justifies Paying More

Once committed, people want to stay consistent, avoid immediate hassle, and protect imagined ownership. These well-studied effects explain why small, late-revealed add-ons are often tolerated.

• Commitment & consistency (low-ball): “An active preliminary decision to take an action tends to persevere even after the costs… have been increased.” The decision to buy precedes the final price, so reversing feels like backtracking.

• Present bias & effort avoidance: restarting a cart or itinerary is disproportionately painful right now, so many finish the purchase rather than rebuild from scratch.

• Sunk costs & self-justification: time spent choosing and entering details feels “invested,” so paying small extras seems better than “wasting” that effort.

• Loss aversion & endowment: by checkout, the item/seat/meal feels mentally owned; backing out feels like a loss. “Losses loom larger than gains,” and “the aggravation… in losing a sum of money exceeds the pleasure of gaining the same amount.”

• Price partitioning effects: splitting a price into base + fees softens attention to the all-in total and reframes fairness (a $2.99 small-order fee feels “reasonable” next to a $25 basket).

• Anchoring (again): people rely “too heavily on the first piece of information,” under-adjusting when fees appear.

Proof It Works: Experiments Show Hidden Fees Boost Spending

Delaying fee visibility changes outcomes. In a large StubHub field experiment, buyers spent ~21% more when fees were shown at the end instead of upfront. At the same time, extra costs (shipping/tax/fees) are the #1 stated reason for abandonment, and overall cart abandonment hovers around ~70%—evidence that these tactics raise conversion when fees feel modest, but backfire when add-ons feel excessive.

Real-World Examples: Amazon, DoorDash, Uber Eats, Instacart, and StubHub in Action

Each example maps directly to the bias stack and the fee timing described above.

• Amazon (e-commerce): Lists a base price, then calculates sales tax at checkout based on delivery address (“estimated tax may be updated when your order is finalized”). The base price anchors value; many accept the last-step tax rather than restart a search.

• DoorDash (food delivery): Common elements: delivery fee (≈ $1.99–$5.99), a service fee (often a percentage), and a small-order fee (~$2.50) under a subtotal threshold. The order summary concentrates add-ons after the menu build, where present bias and sunk effort kick in.

• Uber Eats (food delivery): A service fee (percentage with min/max) plus a small-order fee (e.g., ~$2.99) for low baskets appear before payment confirmation but after item selection. Anchoring on entrée prices, most users accept marginal add-ons to avoid rebuilding the cart.

• Instacart (grocery): A delivery fee (often $3.99+), a service fee (~5%, varies), and potential alcohol/heavy-item fees show up near checkout. Partitioning keeps the initial store price attractive; the all-in total appears when switching stores feels costly.

• StubHub/Ticketmaster (Tickets): When fees are revealed late, buyers spend ~21% more on average and are less likely to switch—even after seeing the true total. It’s a clean demonstration of commitment, loss aversion, and partitioning working together.

Why the Timing and Framing of Fees Matter Most

Two details intensify acceptance of fees at the finish line:

• Timing window: the fee-reveal moment usually lands after users invest effort (browse → select → configure → enter address), raising the perceived cost of switching.

• Line-item framing: breaking charges into small, labeled increments (service fee, delivery fee, small-order fee, cleaning fee) dampens all-in pain while preserving the low base anchor in memory.

At checkout, commitment, present bias, sunk-cost/self-justification, loss aversion/endowment, anchoring, and price partitioning converge to make modest, late-revealed add-ons feel tolerable—often enough to close the sale.

By the time fees appear, the buyer is anchored, invested, and already imagining ownership. And you can simply make more on the bottom-line by increasing the fees after the checkout is initiated.

Top Tweets of the day

1/

Always go straight to the source. Eliminate all middlemen. Its often cheaper that way.

2/

Time to get on Facebook again.

3/

There is an exponential ROI by being a top 1% prompter. Practice 20 minutes daily.

Rabbit Holes

1. Inside Whop: The Secret Sauce Behind Their Explosive Growth by Ryan Clogg

2. I’m a TikTok strategist - AMA by /r/Tiktokhelp

3. Viral Stunts: Lower CaC, Increase Awareness, and Get Backlinks by Edward Sturm

What’d ya think of today’s newsletter? Hit ‘reply’ and let me know.

Do me a favor and share it in your company's Slack #marketing channel.

First time? Subscribe.

Follow me on X.

More Startup Spells 🪄

1. How Lucidchart Turned Memes into Millions of Views (LINK)

2. The Genius of Dynamic Pricing in B2C Apps (LINK)

3. Underground SEO Hustle (buying backlinks to Reddit posts) (LINK)

4. Steal the 'Friends of' SEO Backlink Hack to Boost Domain Rating (LINK)

5. Content Repurposing: From 'Am I The Asshole' To 'Am I The Jerk?' (LINK)